The John F. Kennedy Assassination Homepage

Navigation

  » Introduction
  » The Report
  » The Hearings

Volumes

  » Testimony Index
 
  » Volume I
  » Volume II
  » Volume III
  » Volume IV
  » Volume V
  » Volume VI
  » Volume VII
  » Volume VIII
  » Volume IX
  » Volume X
  » Volume XI
  » Volume XII
  » Volume XIII
  » Volume XIV
  » Volume XV
Warren Commission Hearings: Vol. I - Page 99« Previous | Next »

(Testimony of Mrs. Lee Harvey Oswald Resumed)

Mrs. Oswald.
No. But all medical workers, military, are obligated--all medical workers have a military obligation. In the event of a war, we would be in first place.
Mr. Rankin.
Did you ever learn from your husband how he had his expenses in Moscow for the period prior to the time you went to Minsk?
Mrs. Oswald.
No.
Mr. Rankin.
I hand you Exhibit 23 and ask you if that is a booklet that records your military status.
Mrs. Oswald.
I didn't work. It is simply that I was obligated. There is an indication there "non-Party member".
Mr. Rankin.
I offer in evidence Exhibit 23.
The Chairman.
It may be received.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 23, and received in evidence.)
Mr. Rankin.
As I understand you, you did not serve in the armed forces of the Soviet Union, but because of your ability as a pharmacist, you were obligated, if the call was ever extended to you, is that right?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, that is correct.
Mr. Rankin.
Do you know any reason why your husband was permitted to stay in the Soviet Union when he first came there?
Mrs. Oswald.
I don't know.
Mr. Rankin.
Do you know why----
Mrs. Oswald.
Many were surprised at that--here and in Russia.
Mr. Rankin.
Do you know why he went to Minsk, or was allowed to go to Minsk?
Mrs. Oswald.
He was sent to Minsk.
Mr. Rankin.
By that, you mean by direction of the government?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
Did your husband do any writing while he was in the Soviet Union that you know of?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, he wrote a diary about his stay in the Soviet Union.
Mr. Rankin.
I hand you Exhibit 24 and ask you if that is a photostatic copy of the diary that you have just referred to.
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, that is Lee's handwriting. It is a pity that I don't understand it.
Is that all? It seems to me there was more.
Mr. Rankin.
Mrs. Oswald, that is all of the historic diary that we have received. There are some other materials that I will call your attention to, but apparently they are not part of that. I offer in evidence Exhibit 24.
The Chairman.
It may be admitted and take the next number.
(The document referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 24, and received in evidence.)
Mrs. Oswald.
That is all that only has reference to this? Or is that everything that Lee had written?
Mr. Rankin.
No, it is not all that he ever wrote, but it is all that apparently fits together as a part of the descriptive diary in regard to the time he was in Russia.
Do you know when your husband made Exhibit 24, as compared with doing it daily or from time to time how it was made?
Mrs. Oswald.
Sometimes two or three days in a row. Sometimes he would not write at all. In accordance with the way he felt about it.
The Chairman.
Mrs. Oswald, you said a few moments ago it was a pity that you could not read this. Would you like to have the interpreter read it to you later, so you will know what is in it? You may, if you wish.
Mrs. Oswald.
Some other time, later, when I know English myself perhaps.
The Chairman.
You may see it any time you wish.
Mr. Rankin.
Mr. Chairman, I just heard Mr. Thorne ask if there was any reason why they could not have photocopies of the exhibits. I know no reason.
The Chairman.
No, there is no reason why you cannot. You may have it.
Mr. Thorne.
Thank you.
« Previous | Next »

Found a Typo?

Click here
Copyright by www.jfk-assassination.comLast Update: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:56:33 CET