The John F. Kennedy Assassination Homepage

Navigation

  » Introduction
  » The Report
  » The Hearings

Volumes

  » Testimony Index
 
  » Volume I
  » Volume II
  » Volume III
  » Volume IV
  » Volume V
  » Volume VI
  » Volume VII
  » Volume VIII
  » Volume IX
  » Volume X
  » Volume XI
  » Volume XII
  » Volume XIII
  » Volume XIV
  » Volume XV
Warren Commission Hearings: Vol. I - Page 42« Previous | Next »

(Testimony of Mrs. Lee Harvey Oswald Resumed)

The Chairman.
(The documents referred to were marked Commission Exhibit No. 8, and received in evidence.)
Mr. Rankin.
Now, as I understand, what I will call Exhibit 9 now, to correct the order in which these letters were sent to the Embassy, was your response to the letter of the Embassy dated March 8, is that correct?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, sir.
Mr. Rankin.
Will you compare the translation with the interpreter and advise us if it is correct?
Mr. Krimer.
It says, "Application" in the translation; the Russian word is "Declaration".
Mr. Rankin.
Will you note that correction, Mr. Krimer, please?
Mr. Krimer.
In pencil?
Mr. Rankin.
Yes
Mr. Krimer.
Crossing out the word "application".
Mr. Oswald.
That is correct.
Mr. Krimer.
Sir, this was a printed questionnaire, and there is a translator note on here which states that since printed questions are given beth in Russian and English translation, only the answer portion of the document is being translated.
Mrs. Oswald.
That is correct.
Mr. Rankin.
You have now examined Exhibit 9 and the translation into English from that exhibit where it was in Russian and compared them with the interpreter, have you?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, correct.
Mr. Rankin.
Do you find the translation is correct?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
I offer in evidence Exhibit 9, being the Russian communications, and the English translations.
The Chairman.
The documents may be admitted with the next number.
(The documents referred to were marked Commission Exhibit No. 9, and received in evidence.)
Mr. Rankin.
Mrs. Oswald, do you recall that in the letter from the Embassy of March 8, which is known as Commission's Exhibit 8, that you were told that the time of processing would take 5 to 6 months?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes
Mr. Rankin.
Did you discuss that with your husband?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
And about when did you do that?
Mrs. Oswald.
What is the date of that letter?
Mr. Rankin.
March 8.
Mrs. Oswald.
At that time we did not discuss it. We discussed it in New Orleans. Or more correctly, we thought that if everything is in order, I would be able to leave before the birth of my second child.
Mr. Rankin.
And did you discuss that idea with your husband?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
And you think that you discussed it with him while you were at New Orleans?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
Do you recall that it is also requested in the letter of March 8 from the Embassy, Commission's Exhibit 8, that you furnish one or two letters from relatives residing in the Soviet Union who were inviting you to live with them?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, but I didn't have any such letters and I did not enclose any.
Mr. Rankin.
You never did send such letters to the Embassy, did you?
Mrs. Oswald.
No.
Mr. Rankin.
After you sent Exhibit 9 to the Embassy, did you have further correspondence with them?
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes.
Mr. Rankin.
I will hand you Exhibit 10, a letter purporting to be from the Embassy dated April 18, and ask you if you recall that.
Mrs. Oswald.
Yes, I remember that.
Mr. Rankin.
Will you please compare the translation with the Russian?
« Previous | Next »

Found a Typo?

Click here
Copyright by www.jfk-assassination.comLast Update: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 21:56:33 CET